3.7. Science

In a few hundred years, humanity has made colossal technological progress, and this is only the beginning. The risk already exposed is that these technological marvels exceed our capacity to assimilate them and make reasonable use of them.

However, it is not a question of slowing down the pace (on the contrary!), but of putting clear limits on the scope of technological progress, while the ethical reflection progresses.

These limits must be set in both directions: encouraging the positive use of scientific progress and strictly monitoring potentially dangerous research.

Valuing progress for the benefit of humanity

One of the perverse effects of the current system is the confiscation of research capacities for private or military needs.

But this is just another example of where digital democracy will reverse the incentives: pure scientific research or research projects in the service of humanity will be put forward again.

Examples of areas where knowledge must progress include

Surveillance of dangerous areas

It is not a question of stopping research in areas where an in-depth ethical debate has not yet clearly established an approach, but of putting it under citizen surveillance: military research, artificial intelligence, genetic manipulation, transhumanism.

These and other fields offer a phenomenal potential for scientific progress and for this reason there is no reason to stop research. On the other hand, they also present a threat to humanity and therefore cannot be carried out without strict and transparent supervision.

Here too, transparency, accountability, publicity and public debate are essential.

Next page